Fxaa or smaa reddit. (system is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.

Fxaa or smaa reddit Some games seem to implement TAA worse than others though (Fallout 4's is pretty bad in particular I remember). Ambient Occlusion: This one is a bit tricky. I use FXAA least. If you want a balance between performance and looks, go with this. 8x or higher if you must use MSAA. Try playing with open the vkBasalt. The game is rendered at a high resolution, than scaled down to a lower resolution. Not sure about bloom though, probably not /too/ much. CSAA is better than MSAA IMO so don't go with MSAA when CSAA is available and don't use MSAA 2x. SweetFX SMAA: Low performance cost, but blurs HUD. The game (at the time I played it) resets the in-game SMAA to TAA every time you restart the game and I would forget to change it back, and I ended up just leaving it sometimes. On the other hand, TAA is a temporal method. Today, while messing around with SweetFX, I think I found a way to get satisfactory anti-aliasing with minimal performance impact and HUD blur. MSAA has too high a performance hit with modern rendering methods when it works at all. Locate the ones, define the FXAA quality (one is at 12 and other is at 15) and set them all to 39. Only use as as last resort. NFAA and FXAA are simple and only have 2 or so relevant parameters, SMAA is the only one that takes real tinkering, especially as the SMAA shader has good depth options. Anti-Aliasing: If you can set it to FXAA or TAA. Very little downside to it. I'd recommend supersampling if MSAA isn't available. Dec 27, 2023 · SMAA was introduced to rectify the shortcomings of FXAA and MLAA, and it works well in most scenarios. AFAIK, depends on the game. The paper also mentions FXAA briefly, but it is a completely different approach and usually much faster but yields lower precision and a blurrier final result, while SMAA preserves the sharpness of the original image. Just use reshade and smaa. I'd appreciate any help. FXAA is mostly the least demanding (but doesn't look good and blurs textures), while SSAA (or Super-Sampling/Uber-sampling/FSAA) the most (very rarely used in games, but the best). To fix this: Open Nvidia control panel Go to Manage 3D settings Go to the Program Settings tab Select nvidia geforce experience. Reddit community and fansite for the free-to-play third-person co-op action shooter, Warframe. It should smooth out the jaggies without blur - it should only blur pixels on the edges of stuff. I love FXAA and SMAA, but to be fair they don't give you as good image as well implemented TAA. dk's suit with the Boulotaur2024 injector which applies the effect differently. DSR next least. If the game supports FXAA (ie, it can be toggled within games' graphics settings), it usually means that the FXAA effect is only applied to game visuals and only after that the UI is laid on that. These are very cheap on performance cost but you get what you pay for. Modern FXAA looks very good, but I usually only use it for single-player games where there is no SMAA, which I find sharper. Its uniform and consistent. Also enabling FXAA or SMAA will apply it over the entire image, even HUDs and menus, which will look awful, especially when the majority of the text is only a single pixel thick, like in a lot of 800p games. MSAA for looks and FXAA for close to the same but performs better. FXAA is very light on performance, but it's basically an edge aware blur filter so the end result is less sharp. Fxaa was built specifically to be fast, smaa is subpixel accurate. Are TXAA and TAA the same thing? Possibly. Welcome to Destiny Reddit! This sub is for discussing Bungie's Destiny 2 and its predecessor, Destiny. 🌺 Discord’s biggest community for the Genshin Impact character Lesser Lord Kusanali (named Nahida) - the Dendro Archon who reigns over Sumeru, now on Reddit too! ⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⋆ ⋆⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤⏤ 🌺 Join us for fun events, giveaways, leaked content news and discussion, wholesome and cute fan art, dedicated theorycrafting, general Genshin-related stuff, and much FXAA, SMAA and TAA all have their drawbacks and most are just post-processing features that make the game blurrier. Including FSR 2. If you on the other hand enable FXAA from nvidia control panel, then yea, it will cause blurriness in game ui's and such. fxaa adds very little blur and can help clear up the image in games where i feel nfaa and dlaa add to much blur,so it's a good combo with smaa or cmaa. This guy anti-aliases. However SMAA is a post-process effect that is far better than that of FXAA, and being a post-process effect has little to absolutely no impact on performance, and should by no means cause any kind of input lag, EVEN IF you were to for some reason use V-Sync with it, it still probably would not increase input lag in the same way MSAA could. SMAA is magical but it does seem to omit random jaggies. . TAA, FXAA and SMAA all compromise image quality in some way. I've seen YouTubers and people on Reddit still use these methods so they can get high frames. Always liked MSAA, except for the performance cost. Following it up with a subtle pass of FXAA can really even-out the scene when some parts are blurred but some parts are jagged. In game there is choice between NONE, FXAA, SMAA LOW or SMAA HIGH There is also the option for nvidia override with nvidia control panel There are also third party like GW2Hook or Nvidia freestyle Highly dependent on the game. Currently d3d9_smaa. TAA is the only post-render AA that I find meaningfully combats flickering, especially on lower resolutions. 11, I see subtle differences when switching between them if stationary on track but when moving there seems less difference visually but FXAA is the least costly from a performance perspective although none of them are particularly taxing. The game has a TON of foliage shimmering with SMAA. The FXAA option does work and it is better than nothing, but it still leaves lots of distracting jaggies, shimmering, pixel crawl and blurs the image too much imo. SMAA uses multiple (1-pixel long for sharp geometry and multiple pixels long for diagonal patterns) crossing lines to enhance edge detection, reduce blurring, and improve coverage. always put cmaa/smaa before antialiasing methods that add blur,if you're going to combine them. MSAA. Need a good card. Not sure if you are splitting hairs in some way or just not really up to speed on how FXAA works, but it is exactly a blur filter. Want to mention that MSAA doesn't look at neighbouring pixels, rather it takes multiple samples within the same pixel to determine how much of the pixel a given triangle occupies. If jaggies are not completely gone use FXAA/SMAA. They can actually fix some anti aliasing even with other forms of anti aliasing running. SMAA on the other hand, is visible on high contrast or brighter areas with ropes, fences, swords and other sharp and thin objects. SMMA in some cases can handle aliasing better than fxaa with no blur, but there can be some specific noise which is difficult to explain. This was before the filter ban btw, when you could make your game look more sharp/colourfull etc, smaa/sharpen made it even better then. FXAA - good if you have a low spec PC, but it just blurs everything and still leaves blurry jaggies and shimmering everywhere. The only thing you could do was either inject SMAA, force FXAA via control panel, or turn off "Definition" in the graphics settings, which would apply some blur filter to the game, add motion blur, and DoF to help mask the aliasing. I doubt this was an AMD pay job. I like working with some game screenshots and I cannot enable anti aliasing in them all (Some console games for example) and I'd like to use a more basic post processing based filter like FXAA or SMAA in photoshop afterward btu I have been unable to find any plugin to add this feature, does anyone here know of one? It forces you to use the game's own FXAA, which blurs the whole image , therefore isn't a good form of AA to begin with Using MSAA (by which the game forces FXAA on top of) is a performance hog Therefore I decided to inject SMAA, which is a far superior anti aliasing compared to FXAA, and it doesn't have the performance cost of MSAA. S. Generally just leave both off and use normal AA at 4x or 8x unless you like the look or performance of either TAA is generally better than SMAA. Horizon Forbidden West - SMAA vs TAA (Stationary and In Motion) [ImgSli] With PNG Higher Quality Images -> Horizon Forbidden West - SMAA vs TAA (Stationary and In Motion) [ImgSli] *Decima engine or Guerrilla's engine team or Nixxes itself is insane! Both SMAA and TAA images qualities are identical. I tried to lower the antialiasing and graphic resolution in game settings but no matter what I do reshade will have no effect with FXAA and SMAA. I'll say that FXAA looks ok but I definitely don't know if I would say really good, or maybe it is but at the end of the day fxaa is limited to what it can do. But, I'd wager a lot of people who were outraged at the AA change were all PC gamers with solid rigs. TXAA works differently as it applies a filter over many samples per pixel. That is at removing aliasing, which is the primary goal of AA techniques. MLAA lies somewhere in between (although apparently was improved to have subpixel accuracy recently, however I don't know the performance implications here) In terms of sharpness of post processing edge smoothness, itll go smaa > mlaa > fxaa. Currently using FXAA 3. Yes SMAA is better overall in that it will remove the vast majority of aliasing. FXAA is less demanding on performance but can cause blurring in the image. save the file. This will toggle the effects. Multi-sampling in NVCP does nothing on BotW for it being a shader based game. SMAA was always for performance PCs. If you leave both off it’s just normal AA at 4x or 8x samples. I will update the DLSS file to 3. SMAA uses roughly the same tech as FXAA but does some extra sampling around edges to preserve details that might be lost with FXAA. Looking at neighbouring pixels is typically how post-process spatial AA solutions like FXAA/MLAA/SMAA work. FXAA and SMAA are great, though they don't do the job PERFECTLY, so that there are no jagged edges at all. Screen Space Reflections and Reflections overall. Obviously, MSAA or supersampling is too intense for a video card if you're running a game at 4K. FXAA is crap in general, overeager edge detection just blurs everything almost indescriminatly. Until I encountered TAA, I always took Warframes crisp, non-temporal look for granted. FXAA is much cheaper but doesn't look as good. PC it offers FXAA, SMAA and TAA 8X. Those saying they prefer to turn off AA in every game either have low-end hardware or just like to look at jaggie things. I’ve always had SMAA selected, thinking it was the best option, however now I know I’d have been better off with FXAA which at least would’ve had some effect. Depending on the game implementation, it can lead to ghosting in motion. Now in 1. You can use FXAA/SMAA better with super-resolution, but then you once again get the performance hit. dll) I have no idea where both of these came from though. SMAA is like MSAA but even more hardware intensive. I thought maybe my GPU was weak, but apparently this is a pretty popular method even on beefy GPUs gaming on 4k. It looks the best usually. Nov 22, 2014 · SMAA is your best option. conf and edit the effects line (line number 10), add smaa: effects = cas:smaa. i currently have 2 dll files (d3d9. why are you doubling up on fxaa? Its the worse form of AA and likely is costing you similar performance hit as smaa if you double up. 1080p - either 8x MSAA (if the game is old enough that I can afford it; e. Then they try to filter out the jaggies. The issue is FXAA, which is on by default in my settings. Far better than FXAA with very little (if any) difference in performance. And the performance hit is very small. You have to use Reshade's SMAA. 0 is interesting given that Genshin isn't that graphics intensive The best possible AA that wouldn't cost an arm and a leg in terms of performance would be SweetFX's SMAA with Boulotaur2024's injector. SMAA and FXAA are looking way too sharp and TAA only looks too blurry. I personally strongly prefer a bit of bluriness > shimmering edges when moving. The official unofficial subreddit for Elite Dangerous, we even have devs lurking the sub! Elite Dangerous brings gaming’s original open world adventure to the modern generation with a stunning recreation of the entire Milky Way galaxy. I thought it was a similar technique but essentially better in every way, both in terms of anti-aliasing and in performance hit (being practically none). /r/MortalKombat is the OFFICIAL subreddit of Mortal Kombat 1, released in September 2023, and a grass roots kommunity-run subreddit for the Mortal Kombat franchise. Crt and RSRetroarch shaders work fine in game as far as I can see. The SMAA used by ENB is the first version from mrhaandi, while this one uses CeeJay. Expect either heavy blurriness with mediocre jaggies reduction or nearly no anti-aliasing with minimal blur. It's very dependent on the Algorithm that is used. One helpful feature of many AA shaders is that they offering debugging views so you can look at the edge detection and masking, etc. SMAA is for better quality but easily uses x2 or x3 the processing power of FXAA which still does the job but at slightly lesser quality. SMAA is far superior, obviously msaa is better but murders performance depending on card etc. It uses Deferred rendering and looks stable with SMAA but tested out the FXAA and found FXAA has a lesser known advantage over SMAA. If you are literally sitting with your eyeball stuck to the screen or playing older games, just use dldsr. SMAA. Half-Life 2, Portal 2 and several Unreal Engine 3 titles) or 4x MSAA + FXAA 1440p - 4x MSAA 4K - 2x MSAA (if unavailable, then ReShade's SMAA) or an in-game FXAA I prefer to stay away from post-process techniques (except SMAA). However, SMAA specifically tries to recognise and target edge-stepping. That will tell FXAA to run at 3rd generation at 9th quality, which are the newest and highest quality methods. And it feels like a step backwards. org Shotcut is a free, open source, cross-platform video editor for Windows, Mac and Linux. TXAA is specially designed to counter temporal aliasing: What is temporal aliasing? FXAA also looks like a smeary mess, honestly I'd rather have no AA than FXAA it gaussian blurs the whole screen. That is because FXAA is just a simple edge finder post process while SMAA is a more advanced edge finder. Playing at 1080p with 100% resolution scaling. SMAA doesn't cause blur in motion, that's unique to temporal methods. Its not the best technique out there but its fast. fx and FXAA. you have to use a mix of fxaa and smaa, i like to use SMAA with edge detection threshold at the minimum, luminance edge detection, then fxaa at like 320 on the subpix setting, 168 at the minimum contrast, and 180 for the darkness threshold, to sharpen that i often use filmic anamorphic sharpen since it has a setting that lets you avoid edges, if that doesn't work, lumasharpen and a slightly SMAA file. DSR and supersampling in NVCP also won't work properly, because Cemu follows the rules from gfx pack not desktop/gpu resolution. dll is linked to skyrim though (in proxy library at least). Everything off, used to use smaa + sharpen on for 1080p looked the best, but it removes quite alot of fps. Try out its "Predication" feature that can be turned on in Statistics tab of Reshade and clicking on Edit beside SMAA, then one of the first lines should mention Predication. FXAA is easy to implement everywhere in every game which makes it a perfect no-ressource-wasting entry level AA and an absolute minimum requirement. I was wondering, is the blur less noticable at resolutions such as 4K, rather than 1080P? I'm wondering if FXAA/SMAA blur based on the size relative to the screen, or for a certain amount of pixels(say, a 2 pixel wide line blur). Anti-Aliasing - comparision TSSAA vs SMAA Ghost Trail With TSSAA glitch Just download reshade and select Rpcs3 . You will have to experiment with that however, but the settings aren't as complicated as they may seem, with SMAA across games there would be little to no changes between presets (to achieve best SMAA possible). g. For reference my system gets 75 FPS with FXAA, SSAO off, Ultra shadows, and unlimited Video RAM on (system is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3. The best way to remove Aliasing is to set your Render Scale to 200%. If you have a lot of GPU headroom, you can use SSAA, by setting yuzu's render resolution to 2x that of your screen. The assumption was that a higher pixel density would make the softness of FXAA presentation more paletable but then you may as well just play 1800P + TAA, although there will be ghosting. However in comparison to the blurriness and how units are possessed by ghosts when set to taa, it is the preferable option currently. SSAA x2 and x4 - These are very demanding. FXAA is kind of like fake AA while MSAA is hardware driven so it came effect performance more. I've seen a lot of people use this FXAA+AMD CAS method to "regain details lost with fxaa" but isn't the sharpening applied on top of the FXAA thus only giving the appearance of a crisper image while the real detail is still lost behind the FXAA blur? FXAA. Phones and normal PCs are better off with FSR2 (or honestly FXAA if they offered it). Since FXAA does not have samples to attempt to reconstruct a higher quality pixel, FXAA masks out the image into "geometry" by attempting to detect edges, then apply a smart blur to the edges to remove the step effect of aliasing. shotcut. These are usually expensive. 36 you need to play at 400% yes or yes, and even then you dont have not even half of the graphic quality you got with dx9 hahahaha. SMAA or MSAA are the only options with quality FSR or DLSS (at 4k) being acceptable as well. add this line to the startup settings in steam: ENABLE_VKBASALT=1 %command% run the game it should be enabled by default, to test it edit the controller layout and add HOME / POS1 to a button of your choice. My guess is that the graphics engineer at MHY is a AMD fanboy, which would explain why SMAA/FXAA was simultaneously removed given how easy it is to believe that FSR 2. Please read the sidebar rules and be sure to search for your question before posting. This basically super samples your game and not only increases actual resolution (even if it downscales to your monitors native resolution) but also removes most Aliasing Artifacts. When coupled with another antialiasing technique such as SMAA, FXAA, or supersampling, as well as a decent sharpening shader (FidelityFX, made by AMD, is a fantastic, open source, multiplatform choice that is highly configurable), images can turn out practically flawless, with clean lines, sharp images, and antialiasing even during motion SMAA definitively looks a lot better than FXAA though. Wait, you can change the order in which the post-effects are applied? Does it make any difference? P. If it's using a shader anti aliasing technique like FXAA and SMAA, I also usually leave those on. If SMAA isn't cutting it for you and you want something better but still with a reasonable framerate, try either SMAA or FXAA combined with a little bit of Downsampling/VSR/DSR or go with CSAA or EQAA. You shouldn't need any form of AA at 4k. If a game has TAA I'll use it above all else but it often requires a sharpening filter and if the game doesn't come with one I'll inject it. SSAA - SuperSampling Anti-Aliasing (VSR does this). I've always been confused why devs choose to have FXAA over SMAA though. I am playing dragon quest XI S in 3d mode. The game is currently in open beta on PC, PlayStation 4|5, Xbox One/Series X|S, Nintendo Switch, and iOS! SMAA being the better option usually in terms of blur in-motion. Look for Quality. fhx files. However since it only operates on a single frame it can sometimes still be a decent option in fast-moving scenes or when you have a poor framerate. It is accomplished by enabling the in-game FXAA and adding a sharpening filter via SweetFX. Finally, someone's talking about this stupid bug, both Skyrim SE and Fallout 4 have this same buggy TAA, its a bug, TAA might be great for screenshots and standing still, but actually playing the game? you might get used to it, but i couldn't, shite's too distracting, and nauseating at times, lets hope in next 10 years or so Boris would be able to feature AA in ENBs, its the only way, FXAA SMAA doesn't deal with edge shimmer nearly as well as TAA. If you have a good card then MSAA usually looks better. I haven't played the game myself yet so I don't know if it has depth buffer access on Reshade or not. It's a GPU feature that allows you to render games at higher resolutions and is downscaled to 1080p automatically. In terms of quality, these AA methods go like this DLAA*>SSAA>TAA**>MSAA>FXAA. All the best anti-aliasing methods are definitely performance hogs, but also deliver better visual results. 5. SMAA - Sub Morphographic Anti-Aliasing. With the up-scaling and SMAA and/or TAA, games are just a blurry mess. SMAA - This is supposed to be the best compromise. SMAA is more subtle than FXAA, whose effect can easily be seen because it slightly blurs the entire image. I've messed around for 4 hours with ENB settings, default settings, and my Nvidia control panel settings, and I have not been able to either get some good aliasing for FXAA or drastically reduce blurring with TAA. This does have a huge advantage: They basically don't effect your framerate at all (except for extreme high SMAA). Most commonly I'd use MSAA, with MFAA switched on globally. Whereas SGSSAA/FXAA/SMAA/DSR are more full-screen implementations/overlays, which apply to the whole image after processing and displaying it (sometimes even causing input lag; imo most post-process AA requires much higher fps to look right). FXAA blurs everything and SMAA doesn't do enough or in some cases nothing at all. There's CMAA, which aims to preserve text and texel crispness (something FXAA is known to fail at), then there's SMAA, which is like FXAA, but typically less blurry. r/Mortal Kombat is the biggest Mortal Kombat fan resource on the internet, covering a wide range of MK culture and a premier destination for Mortal Kombat gameplay discussion, both casual and competitive! Post processing aa has varying strengths, higher tx more filtering which afaik helps both the blurring and aliasing but not a fan of either taa or fxaa, fxaa being obvious vaseline but the taa tends to be a blur fest during rapid scenes, I assume thats the(a) reason you don't encounter taa all that often in games. Edit: Some additions corrections, spelling and sourcing. FXAA is essentially an indiscriminate fullscreen blur in comparison. Try to turn those settings down first. Finally: I've heard that Fxaa fixes shading and some issues in Taa. exe as the program Turn off Antialiasing - FXAA Obviously, you could try this in other programs with similar issues. Great explanation! Sep 19, 2024 · What is the main difference between SMAA and FXAA? SMAA provides better edge smoothing and clarity but is more resource-intensive. FXAA just sort of blurs the image along edges. *DLSS includes DLAA as a part of the standard. Try 4x and then 2x if you need to for performance. Also does antialiasing have a big effect on frame rate or does it not change much, like the high quality graphics settings. This feels weird to read. MSAA is somewhere in the middle (mostly used in games). Then we have SMAA, which is post processing AA that uses similar edge calculation as MSAA, meaning it can have light performance requirements like FXAA while not blurring the entire screen. There's also a surprisingly good TAA reshade shader, I'm genuinely surprised with how much better it is than 80% of the current gaming market's implementations. And SMAA is garbaje, even on ultra the quality is terrible (smaa only have 4 levels 1-4), like the older MLAA, you could just be using FXAA from reshade or nvidia control panel and that would sufice lol. In the driver you can enable MLAA in almost any game, this is like the AMD version of FXAA. It leverages edge detection based on color-specific luma . Last resort is upscaling AA like FSR, or you could also do no AA and just max everything else. TAA / TAA High tanks my FPS by 10-20. SSAA or MSAA are mostly a No-Go because they eat a lot of power. FXAA seems the most pointless unless you're using a screen that someone upped the sharpness too much (I actually use FXAA exclusively for this reason), SMAA looks really nice, the TAA implementation looks good too, but in some areas it's doing a seemingly worse job at smoothing edges than SMAA is, while in other areas of the same image it's doing a better job, and in others it's doing a FXAA is fast approximation aka faster AA but worse quality, SMAA is slower but better. Consoles seem to use SMAA. Playing on 1440p I always found FXAA good enough with sharpening on and SSAO off. SMAA is post-process like FXAA and is basically an algorithm to try to combine MorphoLogical Anti Aliasing (MLAA, AMD's alternative to FXAA which was created by Nvidia) with a multi/supersampling algorithm (MSAA or SSAA) and coupling it with a temporal filter, albeit not as aggressive as TXAA (though multiple versions of SMAA have been Correct. 70GHz, 16 GB RAM, 2080 Ti (12 GB)). Major features include support for a wide range of formats; no import required meaning native timeline editing; Blackmagic Design support for input and preview monitoring; and resolution support to 4k. Sep 11, 2013 · FXAA : Post processing AA, fatser than MLAA, simillar quality TAA : temporal - time axis AA (others are all space axis) SMAA 1x : improved MLAA, better quality, faster speed, slightly slower than I've tested all modes and FXAA+TAA is the best option for me. Anything above 1080p I would just go with no AA at all, somehow the game has almost no aliasing in it, a friend of mine plays without AA on a 1080p resolution and says it looks better than FXAA. SMAA does not have that issue. Personally I think Elden Ring has one of the better TAA implementations out there. It also does a great job at correcting white road signs on dark apshalts. SMAA just blurs period, blurring in motion insinuates the blurriness increases upon motion but it doesn't. Worst Quality = Post Process based AA (eg - FXAA, TXAA, SMAA). Open them with a more editor. Because it operates on the final, entire already rendered image and has no concept of the actual geometry, it's literally guessing at what is and isn't an edge by comparing contrast of nearby pixels and applying a gradient filter to them, aka blurring them. FXAA sucks, not sure why it's still used over SMAA. In terms of speed, FXAA>MLAA>SMAA. FXAA is like applying vaseline over the whole screen, it kinda gets rid of jagged edges but only because it blurs the whole image. 0 is better than all other AA (it's not better in all cases). Anti-aliases textures. I find this one strikes a good balance, not a big performance cost for what it provides. Does anyone have any thing that they have found to work? I've tried FXAA, MFAA, DSR, everything. 0 But Taa:high Fxaa: on Msaa:2x settings 65-90 fps, an average of 80 fps is around. If you want best of the best, navigate to your FXAA. SMAA if post AA is the only option, maybe DSR + SMAA. It has edge-detect but not to the degree that SMAA does as SMAA was specifically centred around recognising edges. Applying CSAA may depend on your override settings or how your drivers force anti-aliasing for it to On 1080p I would use FXAA, TAA is only good in very few games. Combining in-game TAA with the Contrast Adaptive Sharpening shader ported to ReShade has been a god send for me. Best looking and most expensive AA is SMAA. DLSS has a forced sharpness from the game which is bad even with choosing the off value it automaticlly return to the "low" preset. exe on the reshade installer (follow the easy onscreen instructions), it will create a file called rpcs3 with reshade, just start rpcs3 by using the new created file and enjoy FXAA and SMAA in vulkan TAA is very blury, FXAA is useless and FSR is a mess. I know you know better, so I think it was poorly So ive been playing a ton of games on my 1440p monitor and man does SMAA look like a mess of pixels but for some reason FXAA smooths everything out and looks so much better. In short: SMAA = +Quality -FPS FXAA = -Quality + FPS And both do the same thing to get rid of them ugly jaggies :3 I've head people saying FXAA absolutely sucks and I've also heard other people say FXAA is much faster, newer and more advanced than MSAA 4x. dll and d3d9_smaa. But you advise me to turn it off. Now that I've been spoiled to 1440p, High/Ultra settings in every game for the past few years, there's no way I can use weaker anti-aliasing methods like FXAA, or SMAA. **TAA is only better than MSAA in most instances as implementations change on a game to game basis. SMAA looks sharp and only smooths out the edges. TAA is slightly heavier on performance than FXAA, but the result is usually sharper. SMAA and FXAA take your finally rendered picture and scan it for jaggies. mzypb rhaqr whga juuuh glgsevo hvqz dftdcj hnarqo vdc dgvnz